Arnold Lobel took home a Caldecott honor in 1971 for Frog and Toad Are Friends, and a Newbery honor in 1974 for Frog and Toad Together. There is no rule that says beginning readers are off-limits to “other” award committees besides the Geisel, but Lobel never won a Geisel—the first award wasn’t given until 2006.
The 2018 Geisel Committee can only place Geisel-eligible books up against other books published in the same year, so they aren’t thinking too much about Frog and Toad. I bet they’ll be thinking just a little bit about the amphibian friends though, because the Frog and Toad-ness in Laurel Snyder and Emily Hughes’s Charlie & Mouse cannot be ignored. It’s there in the muted color palette, the short chapters capturing slice-of-life moments, and the tender relationship between two characters who live together. It is subtle, and who knows how intentional, but it hits all the same notes which make it an excellent beginning reader book and book in general. Of all the readers published this year, Charlie & Mouse is the title I could see receiving crossover committee recognition; but, since we have only Charlie & Mouse on the table today, and we’re examining it for the Geisel Award specifically, let’s get to business and look at all of the ways I think it shines through the Geisel lens:
Repetition.
The repetition here is functional, but not too functional. Words are introduced thoughtfully and in context. Repetition creates predictable pacing (making lines easy to read aloud and with expression) and some humor as well:
“Now it is time for bed,” said Mom.
“Not without a story!” said Charlie.
“No,” said Mom. “Of course not. Not without a bedtime story.”
She read Charlie and Mouse a bedtime story.
“Now it is time for bed,” said Mom.
“Not without a song!” said Mouse.
“No,” said Mom. “Of course not. Not without a bedtime song.”
She sang Charlie and Mouse a bedtime song.
“Now it is time for bed,” said Mom.
“Not without a banana!” said Charlie.
“A banana?” said Mom.
“We need a banana!” said Charlie.
“You need a banana?”
Mouse nodded. “Charlie is right,” he said. “We cannot go to sleep without a bedtime banana.”
Illustrations.
Image from Charlie & Mouse by Laurel Snyder, illustrated by Emily Hughes |
Image from Charlie & Mouse by Laurel Snyder, illustrated by Emily Hughes |
Motivation & Encouragement.
Image from Charlie & Mouse by Laurel Snyder, illustrated by Emily Hughes |
From a Geisel standpoint, I have no concerns about this book. There is a scene when one of the neighbors holds a cigarette, but if anyone questioned that in deliberations I’d remind them that there are to be “no limitations as to the character of the book considered except that it will be original and function successfully as a book for beginning readers.” The plot, rhythm, and visual storytelling in Charlie & Mouse combine to make a book that is excellent for summer, excellent for siblings, and excellent for beginning readers. What do you think?
This is one of my favorites so far this year too, and I loved your comparison to Lobel. There is great pacing, rhythmic language, and great page turns as you pointed out. I loved getting to see the close relationship of Charlie and Mouse, and I appreciated how them being together was integral to the story. I also liked how we got to see their community, and I can't wait for the sequel to see if some of their friends return.
ReplyDeleteIt's funny about the cigarette. I didn't see a cigarette, but rather that he was pointing a finger. But like you said, it doesn't deter from the Geisel criteria, and it something that many people do on their porches. I appreciated that scene though because one can infer that Mr. Erik and Mr. Michael are a couple, even though it isn't explicit. It offers a chance for a child to see some representation of their family makeup, and one thing that is sorely lacking in readers is LGBTQ+ representation. I also appreciated that Mouse doesn't adhere to gender norms in his tutu. (Mouse is never referred to in the text by a he/him pronoun, but the opening flap of the book refers to Charlie and Mouse as brothers.)