Picture from Pigeonpresents.com |
This
year’s committee has quite a task before them. They will consider the final
book in the Elephant & Piggie series, The Thank You Book. We’ve previously
discussed the legacy of this series, which has earned recognition for seven
different titles during the decade that the award has been around. But of
course, the committee must do its best to judge the book solely on its own
merits, disregarding the successes of the series.
The
criteria says:
“The
committee in its deliberations is to consider only the books eligible for the
award” and further clarifies that “the phrase only the books eligible for
the award specifies that the committee is to consider only eligible books,
not an author’s body of work or previous accolades.”
How
does a committee begin to do this? Penny Peck, chair of the 2014 Geisel Award
Committee says "There was no surprise that we had at
least one Elephant & Piggie book to consider our Geisel year, but
none of our committee members took it for granted - either assuming one of the
series would be on our list or dismissing it because of past wins for the
series.” Of course, we know that the outcome of their deliberations was an
honor for A Big Guy Took My Ball!
The committee accomplishes this by adhering
closely to the criteria in their suggestions, nominations, and in their January
discussion.
So how does The Thank You Book fare when
examined through the lens of the criteria?
Last we checked, Mo hasn’t taken up permanent
residence in Paris, and we can also pretty easily deduce that this meets the
other geographic, page count, and target age criteria. (Yes, even though adults
have been eagerly anticipating this final book, it isn’t just for us. It does
still serve PrK-2 sensibilities.) On to the more subjective criteria:
Does it "contain illustrations, which function as
keys or clues to the text?"
Look at that white space. That amazing, glorious, actually white, white
space. We know how important that white space is for the eyes of our beginning
readers, for giving them a visual rest. I suspect that The Thank You Book will have as much or more white space as any
other book under consideration this year. Mo’s illustrations fill that white
space with just the right amount of Gerald, Piggie, and friends. The
illustrations have a cartoon style, complete with color coded thought and
dialogue balloons that provide the reader with guidance as to which character
is thinking or speaking. These thought or dialogue balloons also provide clues
as to the tone of the speech, deepening in hue and developing sharp edges when
Piggie is frustrated, and becoming smaller when Gerald is quiet. And there’s
the broad range of emotion conveyed by the depictions of Piggie and Gerald, with
their depiction providing clues to their confidence, contrition, enthusiasm,
skepticism, joy, frustration, and contentment. While initial illustrations do
not provide clues to decoding “lucky” or “Thank-o-rama”, once Piggie is engaged
in her quest the character names like “Squirrels” or “Pelican” appear on the
same page or spread as that character’s depiction.
Is it "distinguished?"
Distinguished is further defined in the manual as:
·
Marked by distinction: noted for significant
achievement;
·
Marked by excellence in quality;
·
Marked by conspicuous excellence or eminence;
·
Individually distinct;
·
Providing a stimulating and successful
reading experience for the beginning reader containing the kind of plot,
sensibility, and rhythm that can carry a child along from start to finish.
The terms
“individually distinct” and “conspicuous” are always interesting to consider
when evaluating a title in a series, particularly in years when an author has
more than one title eligible, as has often been the case for Elephant & Piggie. But even when a series title is the only one in its year, it is the
challenge of each committee to identify how this entry to the series
demonstrates individual distinction, rather than just the excellence in quality
that we have come to expect from this series. Could this be a factor in why the
Elephant & Piggie series has not taken the Geisel gold since 2009, despite
its very consistent showing at the top?
Observing a child reader is key to truly knowing if it provides
that “stimulating and successful reading experience” that is a mark of
distinction in the genre. Is the subject matter intriguing enough to motivate the
child to read? Does the plot advance
from one page to the next and create a "page-turning" dynamic?" We can
see on page 11 as Piggie leaps out-of-frame that we should turn the page, but is
the dramatic tension between Gerald’s insistence that she will forget
someone and her refutation of that assertion enough to carry a first-time
reader through the multiple vignettes of
Piggie thanking her many friends?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.